SIG: Brainstem [BSS]
Promoting Education and Attainment of the Highest Level of Knowledge and Understanding of Clinical Neurophysiology
The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) has member societies in 62 countries. The IFCN mission is to promote best practice in clinical neurophysiology through education and research throughout the world. And our vision is to improve healthcare worldwide by understanding the nervous system and optimizing the diagnosis and treatment of its disorders through clinical neurophysiology.
Welcome to the website of the Brainstem Special Interest Group!
SIG Working Group Leaders
Satu Jääskeläinen, MD, PhD (Chair)
Professor of Clinical Neurophysiology
Turku University Hospital
Markus Kofler, MD (Secretary)
Professor of Neurology
SIG Scientific Board Members
Lo J. Bour
The Brainstem Special Interest Group [BSS] has developed from the former Brainstem Society [BSS]. The Brainstem Society was founded in the 1990’s by a group of clinicians and researchers devoted to the brainstem. The Brainstem Society has organized several International Meetings every 3 to 4 years, which resulted in several publications.
The Brainstem SIG [BSS] is devoted to the brainstem and all its aspects, from anatomy to neurophysiology, from form to function, from health to disease. The brainstem is a small but most important center in the brain. It serves as a central relay station between spinal cord, cerebellum and cerebrum and is intricately involved in functions ranging from motor control, sensorimotor integration and regulation of autonomic functions to consciousness and attention. Brainstem anatomy and physiology of brainstem functions are complex, and pathophysiological mechanisms are often difficult to understand.
Like the BRAINSTEM SOCIETY in the past, which has been a multidisciplinary organization, also the BRAINSTEM SIG will be a multidisciplinary organization: it is not necessary to be affiliated to any National Society of Clinical Neurophysiology or any other organization to be or become a member of the Brainstem SIG.
With the Brainstem SIG we want to provide a platform for exchanging ideas evolving around the brainstem, and for promoting further knowledge about its physiology and pathophysiology. The Brainstem SIG is open to everybody, clinicians, researchers, technicians, etc. There is no membership fee, and no formal membership is necessary, although people being interested are encouraged to send an e-mail to the Secretary in order to be entered in the mailing list.
We are in the process of transforming the BRAINSTEM SOCIETY into a BRAINSTEM SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Our new name “Brainstem SIG” allows us to continue using our former abbreviation “BSS” in our logo. The past Scientific Board of the Brainstem Society will continue to serve as an interim executive and scientific board of the new Brainstem SIG until a formal General Assembly can be arranged at the next international meeting, the International Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology 2022 in Melbourne, Australia. The board will take actions necessary to formally establish the new Brainstem SIG under the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.
Markus Kofler, M.D.
Department of Neurology
The BrainStem Society was founded by Bram Ongerboer de Visser, Giorgio Cruccu, and Josep Valls-Solé in the late 1990s. It was a club of scientists interested in unraveling some of the unsolved mysteries of brainstem function. Since then seven international meetings have been organized: 1998 in Barcelona, Spain; 2001 in Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2004 in Rome, Italy; 2007 in Mainz, Germany; 2010 in London, United Kingdom; 2014 in Berlin, Germany; and 2018 in Washington, DC, USA. The main focus of the BrainStem Society was always neurophysiology, but at the same time the club was open to related specialties.
|1998 – 2001|
|Founding members:||Bram Ongerboer de Visser, Amsterdam, Netherlands|
Giorgio Cruccu, Rome, Italy
Josep Valls-Solé, Barcelona, Spain
ExCo 2001 – 2004
|Hans Hopf, Mainz, Germany|
Josep Valls-Solé, Barcelona, Spain
Peter Svensson, Aalborg, Denmark
Bram Ongerboer de Visser, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Giorgio Cruccu, Rome, Italy
ExCo 2004 – 2007
|Giorgio Cruccu, Rome, Italy|
Josep Valls-Solé, Barcelona, Spain
Juergen J. Marx, Mainz, Germany
|ExCo 2007 – 2010|
|John Rothwell, London, UK|
Jens Ellrich, Aalborg, Denmark
Mark Hallett, Bethesda, U.S.A.
Markus Kofler, Zirl, Austria
ExCo 2010 – 2014
|Josep Valls-Solé, Barcelona, Spain|
Markus Kofler, Zirl, Austria
Satu Jääskeläinen, Turku, Finland
Giandomenico Iannetti, London, UK
ExCo 2014 – 2018
|Mark Hallett, Bethesda, U.S.A.|
Markus Kofler, Zirl, Austria
Jens Ellrich, Erlangen, Germany
Lo Bour, Amsterdam, Netherlands
BSS International Meetings:
- BSS 1998 in Barcelona, E (Preface)
- BSS 2001 in Amsterdam, NL (Editorial)
- BSS 2004 in Rome, I (Program – Abstracts – Preface)
- BSS 2007 in Mainz, D (Program – Abstracts – Announcement)
- BSS 2010 in London, UK (Program – Abstracts – Announcement – Editorial)
- BSS 2014 in Berlin, D (Program – Abstracts – Announcement – Editorial)
- BSS 2018 in Washington, DC, USA (Program – Abstracts)
Publications of the former Brainstem Society, now Brainstem SIG
Electronic versions are provided to ensure timely dissemination of academic work. They can be downloaded for noncommercial purposes. Copyright resides with the respective copyright holders as stated in each article. The files may not be reposted without permission from copyright holders.
• BSS 1998, Barcelona, E
Manuscripts and Abstracts:
Brainstem Reflexes and Function
Valls-Solé J, Tolosa E (editors)
Madrid: ENE Publicidad, 1998
• BSS 2001, Amsterdam, NL
Movement Disorders 2002;17(Suppl.2):S1-S95 (may require subscription)
• BSS 2004, Rome, I
Supplement to Clinical Neurophysiology Vol. 58
Brainstem Function and Dysfunction
Cruccu G, Hallett M (editors)
• BSS 2007, Mainz, D
• BSS 2010, London, UK
Special Section in Clinical Neurophysiology 2012;123(1):2-83 (may require subscription)
Clinical Neurophysiology 2012;123(2):e1–e8 (may require subscription)
Special Section in Clinical Neurophysiology 2015;126(10):1869-1900 (may require subscription)
• BSS 2018, Washington, DC, USA
Clinical Neurophysiology 2018;129(Suppl.1):e213-e222 (may require subscription)
5th Brainstem Society Congress. London, 2010
Neurophysiology of the brainstem – structure and function of brainstem circuits
The brainstem is a small but most important center in the brain. It serves as a central relay station between spinal cord, cerebellum and cerebrum and is intricately involved in functions ranging from motor control, sensorimotor integration and regulation of autonomic functions to consciousness and attention. Brainstem anatomy and physiology of brainstem functions are complex, and pathophysiological mechanisms are often difficult to understand. The BrainStem Society, which was founded in the 1990s, is a club of scientists interested in unraveling some of the unsolved mysteries of brainstem function. Since then five international meetings have been organized: 1998 in Barcelona, Spain; 2001 in Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2004 in Rome, Italy; 2007 in Mainz, Germany; and 2010 in London, United Kingdom. The main focus of the BrainStem Society has always been neurophysiology, but at the same time the club has been open to related specialties. This is reflected in the scientific programs of previous meetings, and also in the selection of articles in this issue. Further information can be found at: www.brainstemsociety.com.
In this special section, the following 10 articles are based on invited lectures at the 5th International Meeting of the BrainStem Society, December 09–10, 2010, held at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom. They cover a broad spectrum of brainstem anatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, movement disorders, pain and intraoperative neuromonitoring.
The reviews begin with a survey by Prats-Galino et al. (2012) of the functional organization of the main human brainstem centers and circuits, in which novel data from 7-tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and diffusion tensor tracking in post-mortem material, is complemented by a conventional fiber tracking study of the descending pathways in vivo. A set of fascinating figures and a video accompany this excellent paper. It is followed by a masterly survey of the role of neurophysiology in the study of brainstem functions, with a particular emphasis on methods devoted to measuring excitability of neural circuits. Valls-Solé (2012) describes how changes in brainstem reflex excitability can be evaluated via the blink reflex by single or paired stimuli, or via the startle reaction by single or repeated stimulation and points out that these may reflect dysfunction not only in the reflex arc itself, but also at distant sites, e.g. in the basal ganglia. Furthermore, he describes how both reflexes can be modulated by low-intensity stimuli that may induce prepulse inhibition or facilitation. The next paper also deals with the startle reaction and the role of brainstem pathways in motor function. Carlsen et al. (2012) review studies of advance preparation of the motor system during various movement tasks. A startling acoustic stimulus presented during a simple reaction time task results in substantial reduction in response time, suggesting a subcortical mechanism for response triggering. Startling acoustic stimuli applied during voluntary motor tasks can reveal if and when advance motor preparation occurs and whether this process changes with practice. Based on recent data the authors propose an updated model of how a startle reaction may interact with motor system preparation and response initiation. Dreissen et al. (2012) from Marina Tijssen’s group provide an excellent overview about syndromes displaying an exaggerated startle reflex. This response originates in the caudal brainstem following an unexpected stimulus, and comprises an initial bilateral motor reaction and a second orienting response with emotional and voluntary behaviors. The authors distinguish three main categories of clinical syndromes with exaggerated startles: hyperekplexia, stimulus-induced disorders, and neuropsychiatric syndromes. Classification remains challenging, but distinct clinical motor features identified in polymyography may help identify hyperekplexia, while stimulus-induced disorders may require video recordings in addition to careful clinical evaluation. Neuropsychiatric disorders usually have additional behavioral and psychiatric symptoms. Kumru and Kofler (2012) provide a focused overview of recent studies revealing how neurophysiological testing can demonstrate neuronal reorganization in patients with spinal cord injury not only below the lesion and at the cerebral cortex, but also at the brainstem level. They were able to demonstrate and quantify the amount and timing of intrathecal baclofen effects on various brainstem reflexes, and by correlating their findings with clinical changes in muscle tone were able to propose that there are previously disregarded antispastic effects of baclofen at the brainstem level. Findings of altered brainstem reflexes in spinal cord injury and their responsiveness to pharmacological interventions contribute to the understanding of mechanisms underlying functional changes following injury to the central nervous system. Remote pharmacological effects of botulinum toxin are summarized by Palomar and Mir (2012), who provide an extensive review of changes at the spinal, brainstem, and cortical level following botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of focal spasticity or dystonia. Although the primary action of botulinum toxin occurs at the neuromuscular junction where it produces biochemical denervation, remote effects can be demonstrated by refined neurophysiological techniques. Central changes may be due to retrograde transport and transcytosis of the toxin to neurons in the central nervous system. In addition there may be interference with and modification of spinal, brainstem and cortical circuits secondary to altered sensory afferent input from intrafusal fibers of the injected muscle.
The following two papers examine the role of the cerebellum in two clinical conditions, essential tremor and dystonia. Raethjen and Deuschl (2012) discuss in their review up-to-date concepts of essential tremor, which emerges not from one single oscillator but from an oscillatory network comprising most parts of the physiological central motor network. Inferior olive and cerebellum serve as key structures, which are linked via thalamus to cortical motor areas that are, however, only intermittently entrained in tremor generation. Each of the network components may act as an oscillator on its own with dynamically changing contributions to whole network function. Paradoxically the same network that produces pathological tremor also governs voluntary movements, but the interaction within the network determines the emerging type of movement. The central role of the thalamus with a bidirectional mode of thalamocortical interaction seems to be critical for the development of involuntary tremor as opposed to the mainly unidirectional interaction in voluntary motor control, and this difference likely represents one basis for the selective tremor-effect of thalamic deep brain stimulation.
Sadnicka et al. (2012) from Mark Edwards’ group examine recent and controversial ideas about a role of the cerebellum in the pathophysiology of dystonia, based on intimate structural and functional connections between cerebellum and basal ganglia that appear to be involved in patients with dystonia, which is usually associated with a disorder of the basal ganglia. They summarize experimental, clinical, imaging, and neurophysiological data suggesting that in most forms of dystonia the cerebellum shows abnormal, probably compensatory activity, secondary to pathology elsewhere within the sensorimotor network. However, certain subtypes of dystonia have typical cerebellar patterns of altered cortical inhibition, or abnormal eyeblink classical conditioning, suggesting cerebellar dysfunction may in some cases even play a primary causative pathophysiological role. Jääskeläinen (2012) surveys in her excellent review recent concepts of primary burning mouth syndrome, a severe chronic intraoral pain condition which mostly affects elderly women. Three distinct subcategories can be defined neurophysiologically, which are associated with specific etiological mechanisms: (1) peripheral small fiber neuropathy, (2) subclinical major trigeminal neuropathy with pain, and (3) central pain that may be related to deficient top-down inhibition mediated via brain dopamine system. These three subgroups may overlap in individual patients. A combination of neurophysiologic, psychophysical, neuropathological, and functional brain imaging methods is required to diagnose accurately the subtype of primary burning mouth syndrome, which is prerequisite to successful differential treatment strategies specifically targeted at underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Finally, intraoperative neuromonitoring was introduced to the BrainStem Society for the first time by Fernández-Conejero et al. (2012), who review in detail the practical importance of using comprehensive intraoperative facial nerve monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Their technique, which includes facial corticobulbar motor evoked potentials, blink reflex, facial F wave, and lateral spread responses, not only helps to guide the neurosurgeon and to predict the effectiveness of the intervention, but also to provide new insight into the pathophysiology of hemifacial spasm.
Carlsen AN, Maslovat D, Franks IM. Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:21–33.
Dreissen YEM, Bakker MJ, Koelman JHTM, Tijssen MAJ. Exaggerated startle reactions. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:34–44.
Fernández-Conejero I, Ulkatan S, Sen C, Deletis V. Intraoperative neurophysiology during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:78–83.
Jääskeläinen SK. Pathophysiology of primary burning mouth syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:71–7.
Kumru H, Kofler M. Effect of spinal cord injury and of intrathecal baclofen on brainstem reflexes. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:45–53.
Palomar FJ, Mir P. Neurophysiological changes after intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:54–60.
Prats-Galino A, Soria G, de Notaris M, Puig J, Pedraza S. Functional anatomy of subcortical circuits issuing from or integrating at the human brainstem. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:4–12.
Raethjen J, Deuschl G. The oscillating central network of essential tremor. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:61–4.
Sadnicka A, Hoffland BS, Bhatia KP, van de Warrenburg BP, Edwards MJ. The
cerebellum in dystonia – help or hindrance? Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:65–70.
Valls-Solé J. Assessment of excitability in brainstem circuits mediating the blink reflex and the startle reaction. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:13–20.
Institute of Neurology, University College of London,
Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders,
Hochzirl Hospital, Department of Neurology, 6170 Zirl, Austria
Tel.: +43 5238 501 44100; fax: +43 5238 501 45056.
Available online 17 November 2011
6th Brainstem Society Congress. Berlin, 2014
Neurophysiological studies of brainstem functions and reflexes
The Brainstem Society celebrated its 6th International Meeting in 2014 in Berlin, under the umbrella of the 30th International Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology. The scientific program covered mostly neurophysiological aspects of brainstem functions and dysfunctions, including basic physiology, movement disorders, pain and other related topics. Among the 17 oral communications and 31 posters presented in the Meeting, the organization chose a number for preparation of manuscripts to be submitted to Clinical Neurophysiology for publication as original research articles or reviews. Three of them have actually been transformed into real articles that are gathered together in this issue to illustrate the variety and complexity of brainstem function.
In the paper by De Natale et al. (2015), the authors report on the analysis of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in patients with Parkinson’s disease. There is increasing interest in VEMPs as a tool for evaluation of vestibular functions. An interesting aspect of this work is that the authors examined the battery of all VEMPs, i.e., cervical, masseter and ocular. This may be a useful approach to look for abnormalities to reflect global dysfunction of vestibular-related brainstem pathways. Indeed, the origin of abnormal responses can be not only in the vestibular system, but also in brainstem connections or circuits. The authors actually found a significant correlation between the brainstem dysfunction shown with VEMPs and clinical severity, especially postural instability and REM behavior disorder. This work shows the utility of VEMPs as markers of degeneration of brainstem structures. In the paper by Pettorossi et al. (2015), the authors studied the effect of vibration over the neck muscles on body motion perception. The effects depended on the function of the muscle where vibration was applied. They lasted several hours, depending on the frequency and duration of the vibration. The outcome measure was the tracking position error (TPE), which was measured as the error in degrees made when the body is rotated fast towards one direction and slowly in the opposite direction to return to the same initial position. This clever test shows how the vestibular apparatus is limited to detecting low-velocity movements. Vibration of neck muscles modified the effects, either increasing or decreasing the TPE, depending on what muscles and side the vibrator was put on. This demonstrates that perception of whole body position does not depend only on vestibular information but also on the proprioception from neck muscles. This article demonstrates how much there is still to learn on how we integrate our body sensations. In the paper by Castellote and Valls-Solé (2015), the authors investigated the trade-off between accuracy and speed when performing a fast pointing task involving the forearm. The authors showed that movements of this kind could be divided into two parts: a ballistic initial movement and a slower approaching (homing) movement. Only the initial part was speeded-up when a startling auditory stimulus (SAS) is added to the imperative signal, the second part then being slower to compensate for the eventual disturbance caused in the program by the StartReact phenomenon. The physiology of the motor system is still unclear. The combination of a startle (reflex) reaction and task execution (voluntary) is a useful tool to investigate the characteristics of the motor program.
Each one of these articles is based on events that take place at the brainstem, either in the nuclei or in the circuits implicated in reflex responses, integration of sensory signals or subcortical motor programming. The brainstem is an important center for data processing, a crossroad of information and integration of signals, and distributor of commands that contribute to the smoothness and efficacy of the motor program. Clinical neurophysiology is likely the most important tool for the study of brainstem functions and reflexes. The Brainstem Society is proud to contribute these articles to deepen our knowledge of brainstem circuits in healthy subjects and in patients. We thank the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology for its help in the development of and outcome from our Meeting.
Castellote JM, Valls-Solé J. The StartReact effect in tasks requiring end-point accuracy. Clin Neurophysiol 2015;126:1879–85.
de Natale ER, Ginatempo F, Paulus KS, Manca A, Mercante B, Pes GM, Agnetti V, Tolu E, Deriu F. Paired neurophysiological and clinical study of the brainstem at different stages of Parkinson’s Disease. Clin Neurophysiol 2015;126:1871–8.
Pettorossi VE, Panichi R, Botti FM, Biscarini A, Filippi GM, Schieppati M. Long-lasting effects of neck muscle vibration and contraction on self-motion perception of vestibular origin. Clin Neurophysiol 2015;126:1886–900.
Unitat d’Electromiografia, Servei de Neurologia, Hospital Clínic,
Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBAPS (Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica
August Pi i Sunyer), Barcelona 08036, Spain
Tel.: +34 932075413.
Available online 21 July 2015
7th Brainstem Society Congress. Washington, DC, USA 2018
TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2018
8:00AM – 5:00PM
BrainStem Society Meeting
Location: Delaware A
Developed in conjunction with the BrainStem Society
Co-Directors: Josep Valls-Sole, MD (Spain) and Mark Hallett, MD, FACNS (USA)
At the conclusion of this course, participants should be able to:
1. Recognize the role of brainstem circuits in functions such as oculomotor control, respiration and inhibitory mechanisms of pain;
2. Describe the complex relationship between brainstem nuclei and cerebellum in the control of balance and equilibrium;
3. Explain the various functions of the pedunculo-pontine tegmental nucleus (PPTn) and evaluate the potential use of this nucleus as therapeutic target.
Opening of the Meeting
Mark Hallett, MD, FACNS (USA)
Eye and Eyelid Movements
Chairs: Mark Hallett, MD, FACNS (USA)
Spontaneous, Voluntary and Reflex Blinking in Clinical Practice
Josep Valls-Sole, MD (Spain)
Basics of Ocular Motor Control by the Brainstem
David S. Zee, MD (USA)
Eye Movement Disorders due to Brainstem Dysfunctions
Daniel Gold, DO (USA)
Respiration and Sleep
Co-Chairs: Markus Kofler, MD (Austria) and Jens Ellrich, MD, PhD (Germany)
Functional Anatomy, Mechanisms of Respiration
Jeffrey C. Smith, PhD (USA)
Disorders of Respiration During Sleep
Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer, DO, MS (USA)
Facial Pain Syndromes: Differential Diagnoses
Satu Jaaskelainen, MD, PhD (Finland)
Relevance of Brainstem to Pain: Nociceptive System and PGM
Andrea Truini, MD (Italy)
Co-Chairs: Josep Valls-Solé, MD (Spain) and Andrea Truini, MD (Italy)
Brainstem and Cerebellum Control of Balance and Equilibrium
John Rothwell, PhD (United Kingdom)
How to Study Vestibular Nuclei: cvEMP and ovEMP
James G. Colebatch, DSc, FRACP (Australia)
Other Brainstem Functions
Startle and the StartReact Effect: Physiological Mechanisms
Anthony Carlsen, PhD (Canada)
Autonomic Dysfunction: Vagal Nerve Disorders
Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann, PhD (USA)
Non-Invasive Therapy-Oriented Stimulation of Cranial Nerves
State of the Art in Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Jens Ellrich, MD, PhD (Georgia)
State of the Art in Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation
Ian Cook, MD, DFAPA (USA)
5:00PM – 6:00PM
BrainStem Society Business Meeting
THURSDAY, MAY 3, 2018
7:00 – 10:30AM
BrainStem Society Meeting (continued from Tuesday, May 1)
Co-Directors: Mark Hallett, MD, FACNS (USA) and Josep Valls-Sole, MD (Spain)
Focus on the Pedunculo-Pontine Nucleus
Co-Chairs: John Rothwell, PhD (USA) and Satu Jaaskelainen, MD, PhD (Finland)
Anatomy of the Reticular Formation and the PPN
Clifford B. Saper, MD, PhD (USA)
Functions of the PPN
Edgar Garcia-Rill, PhD (USA)
Markus Kofler, MD (Austria)
The PPN and Freezing of Gait
Jorik Nonnekes, MD, PhD (Netherlands)
PPN DBS: Indications and Potential Secondary Effects
Andres Lozano, MD, PhD, FRCSC, FRSC, FCAHS (Canada)
Mark Hallett, MD, FACNS (USA)